4
 

BIOS News

This page shows public news of interest to BIOS members AND visitors.
<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 23 May 2013 5:48 PM | Anonymous
    http://www.nhsemployers.org/Aboutus/Publications/PayCirculars/Pages/pay-circular-AforC-3-2013.aspx

    Key elements of the new Section 17 effective from July 1 2013

    • 67 pence per mile for all car users irrespective of engine size up to 3500 business miles and 24p a mile thereafter.

    • An annual calculation of motoring costs and a twice yearly calculation of fuel costs. If the cost of motoring rises by +5% over the previous twelve months the mileage rate would rise and if it falls below 5% the rate would reduce.

    • Removing the Public Transport Rate (currently 24p) and replacing it with a Reserve Rate which would be 50% of the single rate (33p in July 2013)

    • The full mileage rate to be paid on journeys for training

    • Pedal Cycle rate to rise to 20p a mile

    • Motor Cycle rate rises to 50% of the single rate (33p)

    • Carrying bulky equipment 3p a mile

    • Passenger allowance 5p a mile

    • The single rate calculation will also be used for reimbursing staff for attendance at required training courses. Currently this travel is reimbursed at the lower Public Transport Rate.
    mileageFAQ Final May 2013 (2).doc
  • 19 May 2013 12:01 PM | Anonymous
    Lesley-Anne Baxter, Chair of BIOS, attended an event at HCPC headquarters on 9th May.
    Read the presentation here:
    HCPC Francis event 090513.pdf
  • 09 May 2013 10:05 AM | Anonymous
    on the BBC News website
    Full link http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22245620

    Canadian doctors say they have found an inventive way to treat lazy eye - playing the Tetris video game.The McGill University team discovered the popular tile-matching puzzle could train both eyes to work together.

    In a small study, in Current Biology with 18 adults, it worked better than conventional patching of the good eye to make the weak one work harder.

    The researchers now want to test if it would be a good way to treat children with the same condition.

    UK studies are already under way.

    An estimated one in 50 children has lazy eye, known medically as amblyopia.

    It's much better than patching, much more enjoyable, it's faster and it seems to work better”

    Dr Hess Lead researcher

    It happens when the vision in one eye does not develop properly, and is often accompanied by a squint - where the eyes do not look in the same direction.

    Without treatment it can lead to a permanent loss of vision in the weak eye, which is why doctors try to intervene early.

    Normally, the treatment is to cover the strong eye with a patch so that the child is forced to use their lazy eye.

    The child must wear the patch for much of the day over many months, which can be frustrating and unpleasant.

    Learning through play

    Dr Robert Hess and colleagues in Montreal set out to investigate whether a different approach might work.

    Armed with a special pair of video goggles they set up an experiment that would make both eyes work as a team.

    boy wearing an eye patch The usual treatment is to patch the stronger eye to make the weaker one work harder

    Nine volunteers with amblyopia were asked to wear the goggles for an hour a day over the next two weeks while playing Tetris, the falling building block video game.

    The goggles allowed one eye to see only the falling objects, while the other eye could see only the blocks that accumulate on the ground in the game.

    For comparison, another group of nine volunteers with amblyopia wore similar goggles but had their good eye covered, and watched the whole game through only their lazy eye.

    At the end of the two weeks, the group who used both eyes had more improvement in their vision than the patched group.

    The researchers then let the patched group have a go at using the goggles with both eyes uncovered. Their vision then improved significantly.

    Patching 'may be hindrance'

    Dr Hess said the treatment could be a good alternative to patching, particularly for adults because they tend not to benefit from this anyway.

    And any number of computer games could work - not just Tetris.

    He said: "When we get the two eyes working together, we find the vision improves.

    "It's much better than patching, much more enjoyable, it's faster and it seems to work better."

    He said his research and other studies suggest amblyopia is actually a two-eye problem and that patching the good eye may hinder rather than help the weak one.

    Forcing both eyes to co-operate increases the level of plasticity or adaptability in the brain and allows the weak eye to relearn how to see, he said.


  • 15 April 2013 5:59 PM | Anonymous
    The timeline is 1862 - 2012, but the celebrations are continuing into 2013!

    Find out more on the BBC and ITV Local News websites and in the April Edition of Parallel Vision

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-17386457
    http://www.itv.com/news/central/story/2013-03-16/child-patients-create-artwork/
  • 17 March 2013 7:45 AM | Anonymous
    The new arrangements will come into effect on 1 July 2013.  The new system will be simpler and easier to use. It will apply the same reimbursement rate to all staff regardless of how many business miles they travel and it has built-in reviews, to ensure that payments continue to cover any costs that staff incur.

    The reimbursement rates will be based on information in the AA guides on motoring costs and will be reviewed by the NHS Staff Council twice a year, using the latest guides. 

    Using the AA guides

    The AA guides on motoring costs take into account  all the costs of keeping a car on the road, including petrol, repairs, insurance and road tax.  The NHS rates are based on the AA's figures for a car in the mid price range (£17,000 - £27,000) with a mileage of 10,000 a year.

    Under the new arrangements, the NHS rates will be reviewed every April/May and October/November, based on the latest AA guides.  The NHS rates will only change if the AA costs result in a five per cent shift, up or down.  

    How will the new system differ from the current one?

    The current system has different rates for infrequent (called 'standard') or frequent (called 'regular') users.  It also takes into account engine size, with an additional fixed payment for frequent users. There is no system for measuring costs and ensuring that reimbursement is appropriate.  These arrangements have not been reviewed since 2000.

    Guidance on new arrangements 

    The NHS Staff Council has produced the following materials which outline the new arrangements:

    • Section 17 - This will form part of the NHS terms and conditions of service handbook. It covers the new arrangements for reimbursing travel costs, the mileage that will be eligible for reimbursement and has information on the AA guides.   
    • FAQs - frequently asked questions about the review and the  new arrangements.
    • Review report - the full NHS Staff Council report on the national review of reimbursements of travel expenses.
    • Example rates - we have produced some example rates for illustrative purposes only, based on the April 2012 AA guides.  These are not the rates that will be used on 1 July 2013 - in April/May 2013, the NHS Staff Council will use the latest AA guides (for 2013) to agree the final rates that will be effective from 1 July 2013.  

    Updated guidance on lease cars 

    The NHS Staff Council has also agreed an addition to the existing guidance on lease cars in the NHS terms and conditions of service handbook, which is effective immediately. 

    The addition reflects current good practice.  It requires the employer and staff member to discuss whether a lease car is the most appropriate option for business travel – a test of ‘reasonableness’ -  taking into account need and cost, before applying the ‘public transport’ reimbursement rate  of 24p a mile.   

    Next steps

    The new arrangements will come into effect on 1 July 2013.  The changes will be implemented via the Electronic Staff Record (ESR) as part of routine updates to the system. 



  • 11 March 2013 1:16 PM | Anonymous
    Pensions Changes Mar2013.pdf

    Latest advice for members in England, Wales and Scotland
  • 06 March 2013 6:28 PM | Anonymous

    Taken from Union South West News Bulletin:

    The consortium of NHS trusts set up to cut pay and conditions of South West health workers has suffered another defection. North Devon Trust has walked away from the cartel leaving 18 left. The cartel has been criticised by ministers and faces overwhelming opposition from public opinion in the region yet it staggers on. The union campaign against the cartel has made a real difference but threats to health workers remain.

    Unions recognise the massive pressure on the NHS from the financial squeeze. Despite government promises of protection, the funding crisis could cost the equivalent of 6,000 jobs according to the South West cartel and "may contribute to a decline in the quality of care offered and therefore patient safety".

    Tough national negotiations have resulted in a new agreement under what is called 'Agenda for Change' and unions expect all NHS trusts to stick to its terms. The Pay Cartel, however, wants to go further in cutting terms and conditions

    Chris Bown, Chief Executive of Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and the chair of the consortium steering group said "The consortium was delighted that agreement was reached on amendments to the national Agenda for Change framework." The cartel aims to support trusts as they make the most of the flexibilities in the agreement.

    Bown added:  "There has been much speculation over the consortium's work and intentions, and I believe that in publishing the report today, many of the myths surrounding the consortium will be shattered - for example, there are no proposals to implement regional pay."

    Unison and BOSTU have warned of the potentially damaging impact on the NHS of proposals contained in the Pay Consortium's report.

    While the report does not identify any immediate plans to implement changes outside the revised Agenda for Change agreement, unions fears that it signals future threats to terms and conditions.

    BOSTU is against regoinal pay bargaining as demonstrated by this article - Regional Pay Ad Mod Govt Sept 2012.pdf


  • 28 February 2013 4:09 PM | Anonymous

    NHS Staff Council joint communication

    For Immediate Release: 26 February 2013

    NHS Staff Council agrees changes to national pay terms and conditions

    The NHS Staff Council, representing employers and unions, today (26 February) agreed changes to the NHS Terms and Conditions of Service Handbook, which covers the Agenda for Changecontracts used by almost one million NHS staff in England. They will come into effect from 1 April 2013.

    Employers and trade unions recognise the unprecedented challenges faced by the NHS, and the benefits of maintaining a national pay system that is modern and responsive to the needs of both local employers and their staff.

    Dean Royles, director of the NHS Employers organisation said:

    "This is an important step. The revisions ensure the national pay framework is responsive to the needs of the service, supporting compassionate patient care and maximising job security.

    "This will increase the health service's confidence in the usefulness of the national pay arrangement, which continues to help the NHS support and manage an effective workforce."

    Speaking on behalf of the NHS trade unions Christina McAnea, Staff Side Chair said:

    "In reaching agreement on changes to national terms and conditions for NHS staff today, we expect this agreement to provide security for staff, that their pay terms and conditions will continue to be agreed nationally and prevent further moves towards local pay.

    "We now expect employers locally to work in partnership with staff sides to implement these proposals fairly and equitably."

    The agreed changes to the contract are:

    • Progression through all incremental pay points in all pay bands to be conditional on individuals demonstrating that they meet locally agreed performance requirements in line with a proposed new Annex addition to the handbook.

    • For staff in bands 8C, 8D and 9, pay progression into the last two points in a band will become annually earned, and only retained where the appropriate local level of performance is reached in a given year.

    • The removal of accelerated pay progression associated with preceptorship for staff joining pay band 5 as new entrants.

    • The scope to put in place alternative, non AfC, pay arrangements for Band 8C and above.

    • New guidance on the principles to be followed regarding workforce re-profiling, including the need to follow the processes set out in the NHS Job Evaluation Handbook and the application of local organisational change policies to protect staff in cases of staff redeployment into lower grade posts.

    • Pay during sickness absence will be paid at basic salary level - not including any allowance or payments linked to working patterns or additional work commitments. This change will not apply to staff who are paid on spine points 1 - 8 of Agenda for Change, or to those whose absence is due to work-related injury or disease.

    The NHS Staff Council parties will work together to ensure that terms and conditions continue to be responsive to the needs of the service, are supportive of quality, compassionate patient care and maximise job security. It will continue to have timely discussions that maintain a sustainable national pay and conditions agreement used across the NHS.


    -- ENDS --



  • 19 February 2013 10:46 AM | Anonymous

    Robert Francis QC states that: “...it should be patients – not numbers – which counted. The demands for financial control, corporate governance, commissioning and regulatory systems are understandable and in many cases necessary. But it is not the system itself which will ensure that the patient is put first day in and day out. Any system should be capable of caring and delivering an acceptable level of care to each patient treated, but this report shows that this cannot be assumed to be happening.”

    The Francis Report, Part 2, is damning of the care received by patients in Mid Staffs and five other hospitals in England. While it is mainly concerned with needless deaths, the report will affect all of us working in the NHS (or as suppliers to the NHS) in one way or another, whatever country you are in.

    The BIOS is writing its full response to the report and it was on the agenda for our Council Finance and General Purposes Meeting in February 2013.

    We also want to hear from you. So,  please do add to the debate on our web forum on what other steps you think are important that we take as a profession and what your thoughts are.

    First themes emerging include:

    Patient Voice - we must actively seek and deal with patient feedback transparently and systematically and learn lessons from it. With this is mind, we will be looking to BIOS groups, such as Branches, Professional Development, Education and Special Interest Groups to include patients and members of the public in study days and meetings starting this year.

    This further builds on our work on developing patient stories so that we have case studies written in language accessible to those who are not familiar with orthoptics. https://orthoptics-org.wildapricot.org/patients
    We also encourage all orthoptists to regularly check feedback on their eye health care services on their Trust website and through public ones such as Patient Opinion and NHS Choices, and act on that feedback in a timely way.
    https://www.patientopinion.org.uk

    Professionalism– running workshops which highlight the role of individual and personal responsibility of orthoptists as part of the wider care team. Although initially open to Heads of Depts and TU Reps, we have widened access to face to face workshops during 2013 as they are proving to be popular with members and are helping us to discuss issues which are even more important in the light of Francis Part 2.

    It is also proposed that a SurveyMonkey be run on whether members have had regular appraisals, routes to talk about their concerns in confidence, regular team meetings, one to one meetings etc in order to look into how well orthoptists are being managed and encouraged to share their opinions about standards of patient care.

    Evidence-based care pathways– these were completed in February 2012 for Cancer, MSK, Stroke and Trauma and are evidence-based care pathways demonstrating how AHPs (including orthoptists) improve patient care and save the NHS money and provide a quality service.

    Approach to risk management during change - Lastly, something which we are concerned with as a profession already, is the potential threat to patient safety and quality of care as we are asked to restructure, cut and make cost savings. This is already done hand in hand with robust risk planning in the majority of cases– but it may well be that we have to inject even more rigour into this
    process.

    The Francis report will play a large role in determining our future strategy and direction of travel as a profession – please review what you are doing now to support implementation of the key findings.


    Lesley-Anne Baxter, Chair BIOS & BOSTU

  • 08 January 2013 10:13 PM | Anonymous
    Lesley-Anne Baxter talks about how telehealth will affect orthoptists and orthoptics in a new Dept Health, Connecting for Health-sponsored video...

    Watch the video:
    http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/engagement/clinical/ncls/ahp/ahpq2

    Transcript:
    "I'm an Orthoptist, I deal with eye health across a number of regions. I'm looking at stroke rehabilitation as well as children with squints and eye problems. Telehealth and telecare will really important for us in the future, both to keep the technology advances that are going on with age related maculids generation and the diagnosis of that condition early, as well as being able to help parents look at their children's eyes, and to test their vision, in their own home surroundings where the children will actually be more compatible to treatment and and/or care.

    Younger adults with acquired brain injuries can actually be helped with looking after their own condition in their own homes or in universities, and I've certainly got patients who I actually now go and see in university where I will be able to skype them, or to use telehealth or telemedicine to encourage them to undertake treatments while they are at university or away from home."


<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
 

© Copyright British and Irish Orthoptic Society 2011-2012. All rights reserved.     Privacy Policy    Website Terms of Use

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software